- This is a guest post from Louis Venter of search marketing specialists Mediavision as part of Be My Guest month.
In my opinion, one of the key areas of concern within SEO circles is the enormous amount of SEO fodder that is being pumped into the internet to influence search rankings.
This doesn’t seem to be stopping either, with new services being launched to “rewrite” vast amounts of articles and distribute them online becoming almost mainstream.
At SES London recently the content was described as “not Pulitzer-prize winning”. I would go as far to say that a great deal of it is complete and utter crap that does nothing to build a client’s brand or reputation.
Now while I don’t believe that all of these articles currently hold the same value within Google’s algorithm, I do think their search quality team will attempt to address this problem as quickly as they can. The main question, though, is how.
My gut feeling is that they will use a social footprint to establish whether or not to count the link love to the destination website. They already have deals with Twitter and Facebook to crawl their posts in near-real time, and with these two platforms being two of the primary sources of content sharing at the moment it gives Google a fairly accurate picture.
Google will obviously have to address Twitter spam, which seems to be rife at the best of times. Given their early attempts at real-time search, they clearly don’t have a handle on how to measure social influence accurately, but these are early days after all.
Which brings me round to Buzz. Despite the obvious privacy issues, Google has placed a lot of resource into Buzz and this shows their hand a great deal in my opinion. I would not be at all surprised if Buzz was aimed at delivering a social footprint for the search quality algorithm. One obvious use for this data would be to separate the signal from the noise in online PR.
What should SEOs be doing to counter this?
Well, firstly, the rules of PR haven’t changed. Write great informative pieces of content that will attract links on their own. Make sure that these pieces of content are easily shareable and Tweetable and promote the content in the same way as you would promote your client’s site. Understand that everything you do is online PR and not just writing. The PR aspect of that is key.
If you manage to do this successfully, and Google do manage to clear out the noise, you will be sitting very pretty indeed.
Tagged with: Facebook, Google, SEO, SES London, social search, Twitter
Comments
uberVU - social comments
March 23 2010 at 1:37 am
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by ABC_Copywriting: Guest post on the future of SEO from @louisventer http://tinyurl.com/yld3lzu #seo #bemyguest…
Louis Venter
March 23 2010 at 1:05 pm
Thanks for the comment Paul
To me theres so much follow the crowd thinking within SEO and every now and then people get surprised when the mainstream efforts no longer work. To me you need to think beyond whats easy and quick to deliver that great ROI graph for your client…..
Thanks again to Tom for the opportunity to guest post!
In defence of SEO copywriting | ABC Copywriting blog
March 26 2010 at 6:47 pm
[...] Google, social search and the future of online PR [...]
Google and Content Farms - what could the new classifier uncover? - State of Search - State of Search
February 1 2011 at 1:11 pm
[...] s1); })(); I first wrote about what I thought Google’s next step would be in March 2010. It was a post triggered during SES London 2010 while I was watching the pro automated spam [...]
What do you think?
Categories
- Branding
- Copywriting
- Copywriting reviews
- Freelancing
- Fun
- Persuasion
- Plain English Patrol
- Popular
- Recent copywriting projects
- SEO
- Social media
- Tone of voice
- Uncategorised
Months
Scribblin' PaulMarch 22 2010 at 10:37 am
I love how all truly honest SEO advice eventually comes down to “write/make great things”.
Nice post, Louis.
I’m cautiously optimistic that Google + social media feedback will downgrade much of the gibber.